Main menu

Pages

Quasiprobabilities shed light on quantum advantage

  

Quasiprobabilities shed light on quantum advantage

 Image of three distorted, melting dice
Courtesy: Shutterstock/J.Schelkle

Quantum advantage is a hot topic, with multiple experiments approaching (and some even surpassing) the point at which a quantum technology performs better than its classical predecessor. But how often does quantum advantage arise, and under what circumstances is it possible? These are some of the questions that David Arvidsson-ShukurJacob Chevalier Drori and Nicole Yunger Halpern explored in a recent paper in Journal of Physics A, which (like Physics World) is published by IOP Publishing.

Here, Yunger Halpern and Arvidsson-Shukur describe their research, their goals and their plans to test their predictions experimentally.

What was the motivation for your research?

Probabilities govern many aspects of our world, from university admissions to earthquakes to family poker games. These everyday probabilities have exotic cousins known as quasiprobabilities that are used to describe quantum observables such as an electron’s position and momentum (which cannot be described using a joint probability distribution because the observables are incompatible, being represented by operators that do not commute). Quasiprobabilities resemble probabilities in that they sum to one. However, they can assume negative and nonreal values as well as positive ones. Such values are called “nonclassical,” as they are inaccessible to the probabilities that govern the classical world.

Photo of Nicole Yunger Halpern

Nonclassical values of a particular quasiprobability have recently been shown to underlie some types of “quantum advantage” – that is, the ability of some quantum technologies to outperform their classical counterparts in computation, measurement, and thermodynamics. This special quasiprobability has an awkward name – it’s called the Kirkwood–Dirac quasiprobability, in honour of two 20th-century physicists – but considering the surnames of all three coauthors on this paper, we can’t criticize.

Given the importance of the Kirkwood–Dirac quasiprobability’s nonclassical values, two natural questions arise: Under what conditions does this quasiprobability behave anomalously? And how anomalous can its behaviour get? That’s what we wanted to explore.

What did you do in the paper?

We pinned down conditions under which the Kirkwood–Dirac quasiprobability assumes nonclassical values. Using these conditions, one can calculate which experiments can exhibit certain types of quantum advantages. We also put a “ceiling” on how much nonclassicality one Kirkwood–Dirac quasiprobability distribution can contain.

What was the most interesting or important finding?

Nonclassical Kirkwood–Dirac quasiprobabilities (and thus the quantum advantages achievable with them) turn out to be rarer than was previously expected. The Kirkwood–Dirac quasiprobability is defined in terms of observables such as position and momentum, or components of spin. Researchers previously believed that, whenever these observables failed to commute, the quasiprobability would assume nonclassical values. But our research shows that nonclassical Kirkwood–Dirac quasiprobabilities are more outlandish than quantum uncertainty.

Why is this research significant?

Photo of David Arvidsson-Shukur

For intertwined practical and fundamental reasons. We’re in the midst of the second quantum revolution, in which quantum physics is being applied to outperform everyday technologies in information processing, security, measurement, communication and more. Nonclassical Kirkwood–Dirac quasiprobabilities have been proven to underlie some of these quantum advantages.

Our work reveals conditions under which this quasiprobability becomes nonclassical, and thus also conditions under which quantum physics can bring advantages to technologies and protocols. Our results can be used to design experiments that leverage quantum resources. Furthermore, pinpointing what empowers quantum resources helps reveal how the quantum world differs from the classical in a fundamental sense.

What will you do next?

We’re collaborating with Aephraim Steinberg’s lab at the University of Toronto, Canada. Our experimental collaborators there are using photons to measure a property of a crystal, and they’re also measuring a Kirkwood–Dirac quasiprobability that describes their experiment. The crystal property they’re studying can be inferred most efficiently when this quasiprobability is negative or nonreal. Hence, the experiment signals that a nonclassical Kirkwood–Dirac quasiprobability underlies quantum resources’ ability to enhance our measurement abilities. We hope that this proof-of-principle experiment will lead to more uses of our work in sensing and other quantum technologies.

  • Find out more about quasiprobabilities in a webinar delivered by Nicole Yunger-Halpern as part of Physics World’s Quantum Week.

Comments